animalagriculture.org


|  HOME  |  NEWS  MEMBERSHIP  |  ABOUT NIAA  |  ISSUES  |  PUBLICATIONS  |  MEETINGS & EVENTS  |  EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES

 

2004-2005 NIAA Resolutions and Position Statements


2005-2006 NIAA Resolutions & Position Statements

Cattle Health

 

Quality Assurance/Residue Avoidance

 

BACKGROUND: Animal health and production food safety is needed at the farm level, which is the first step in the food chain. The application of best management practices will eliminate or reduce the risks of chemical residues and microbial pathogens.

 

POSITION STATEMENT: The National Institute for Animal Agriculture (NIAA) supports the implementation of quality assurance on a local, state, and national level. Further, NIAA encourages quality assurance education of all interested and concerned commodity groups, industries and professional organizations to promote dissemination of information and encourage implementation of best management practices.

 

Approved: 2000  |  Reaffirmed: 2001  |  Reaffirmed: 2002  |  Amended: 2003  |  Reaffirmed:  2004 |  Reaffirmed:  2005

  • Want to print this resolution?  Click here for the best format.

Johne’s Disease

 

BACKGROUND: Johne’s disease is a chronic, progressive intestinal disease caused by an infection with Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis. It is an insidious wasting away disease affecting cattle and other livestock species. Knowledge of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, management, treatment and control is increasing. Johne’s disease adversely affects the intrastate and interstate movement of cattle and the international export market, causing an excess of $1 billion annually in lost revenue to our livestock industry. 

POSITION STATEMENT: The National Institute for Animal Agriculture (NIAA) supports the USDA Uniform Program Standards for the Voluntary Bovine Johne’s Disease Control Program and recognizes the contributions of the National Johne’s Working Group, a subcommittee of the USAHA Johne’s Committee, in developing the various program elements, procedures and infrastructure necessary to support implementation of the Uniform Program Standards. NIAA encourages each state to implement a voluntary program of Johne’s disease control based on the Uniform Program Standards and encourages producers and veterinarians to implement recommended best management practices to reduce the incidence of Johne’s disease in U.S. cattle herds.  NIAA continues to support annual program funding at  $18.74 million an additional $1.5 million for ARS and $1.2 million for Johne’s Disease Integrated Program.

Approved: 2000  |  Amended: 2001  |  Amended: 2002  |  Amended: 2003  |  Amended: 2004  |  Amended: 2005

  • Want to print this resolution?  Click here for the best format.

U.S. TB Interim Rule

 

BACKGROUND: The Border States consensus document has been replaced by the USDA TB Interim Rule.

 

RESOLUTION: That National Institute for Animal Agriculture supports the USDA TB Interim Rule, which outlines specific requirements that must be met by each Mexican state within a prescribed time period for cattle to continue to be exported to the U.S. Also, NIAA encourages USDA to finalize the TB International Rules in a timely manner.

 

Approved: 2002  |  Reaffirmed: 2003  |  Reaffirmed: 2004  |  Reaffirmed: 2005

  • Want to print this resolution?  Click here for the best format.

Support for NAHMS Livestock Surveys

 

BACKGROUND: The health of livestock in the United States is of prime importance to NIAA. Qualification of health and management of animal agriculture is critically needed with the help of producer groups and government.

 

POSITION STATEMENT: The National Institute for Animal Agriculture (NIAA) supports the development of NAHMS surveys, special projects, and surveillance programs and their successful completion, proper evaluation, and dissemination of results.

 

Approved: 2000  |  Amended: 2001  |  Reaffirmed: 2002  |  Reaffirmed: 2003  |  Reaffirmed: 2004 |  Reaffirmed: 2005 

  • Want to print this resolution?  Click here for the best format.

Bovine Virus Diarrhea (BVD)

 

BACKGROUND: Newly recognized variants of BVD virus have the potential of creating high morbidity and mortality in naive herds or improperly vaccinated herds. BVD persistently infected cattle are the main source of infection.

 

POSITION STATEMENT: The National Institute for Animal Agriculture (NIAA) encourages the education of veterinarians and producers on BVD disease, the proper use of BVD vaccines in the prevention of disease and the adoption of testing procedures to identify persistently infected carriers.

 

Approved: 2000  |  Amended: 2001  |  Reaffirmed: 2002  |  Amended: 2003  |  Reaffirmed: 2004  |  Reaffirmed: 2005 

  • Want to print this resolution?  Click here for the best format.

Biosecurity/Biocontainment Education

 

BACKGROUND: The control of infectious and contagious diseases in livestock populations is critical to production efficiency and product quality. Biosecurity and biocontainment strategies employ multiple approaches based on the ecology of infectious disease agents on livestock premises to reduce the risk of disease agent entry or spread.

 

POSITION STATEMENT: The National Institute for Animal Agriculture (NIAA) supports the development and implementation of educational programs for livestock producers and veterinarians on biosecurity and biocontainment.

 

Approved: 2001  |  Amended: 2002  |  Reaffirmed: 2003  |  Reaffirmed: 2004 |  Reaffirmed: 2005

  • Want to print this resolution?  Click here for the best format.

Animal Health Safeguarding Review

 

BACKGROUND: The Animal Health Safeguarding Review was undertaken to assess the performance and efficiency of the infrastructure of Veterinary Services. The review includes activities, procedures, policies, partnerships and authorities that comprise the existing safeguarding system. Specific recommendations have been proposed through that review on how to optimize the system.

 

RESOLUTION: The National Institute for Animal Agriculture (NIAA) urges APHIS to continue to follow up and provide needed funding to implement the recommendations of the Animal Health Safeguarding Review.

 

Approved: 2001  |  Amended: 2002  |  Amended: 2003  |  Reaffirmed: 2004  |  Reaffirmed: 2005

  • Want to print this resolution?  Click here for the best format.

Preventing Exotic Ticks and Hemoparasitic Disease Establishment in the U.S.A.

 

BACKGROUND: There is an increased risk of the introduction and establishment of exotic animal pests and diseases as a result of the changing dynamics of animal movements and transmission of hemoparasitic diseases.  A particular focus on the risks associated with the Mexican and Caribbean Region is required.

 

Actions to prevent the establishment of exotic ticks that infest livestock and other animals including wildlife in the USA is a continuous task. Such action requires vigilance, diligence and singleness of focus from scientific, animal (domestic and wild) and regulatory communities.

 

It is important that these communities join in a common effort and thrust aimed at effectively preventing the establishment of exotic ticks and hemoparasitic diseases in animals in the USA.

 

RESOLUTION: The National Institute for Animal Agriculture (NIAA) urges the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) to enter into a joint effort with state animal health officials, animal industries and wildlife interests to define and support a core organization/commission to facilitate the acquisition and allocation of continual funding for preventing the establishment of exotic animal pests and hemoparasitic diseases in the USA. NIAA recognizes and supports the US-Mexico Bi-National Commission to combat ticks in the US.

 

Approved: 2003  |  Amended: 2004 |  Reaffirmed: 2005

  • Want to print this resolution?  Click here for the best format.

BSE Risk Assessment

 

BACKGROUND: Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) is a chronic, degenerative disorder affecting the nervous system of cattle.  It is associated with consumption of animal proteins contaminated with specific risk materials containing the infective agent.

 

A prudent, scientifically sound, risk-based approach to regulation is essential to control risk of transmission of BSE in North America.

 

The quantitative BSE risk assessment prepared by the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis (the Harvard model) indicates that an amplification of the BSE agent is unlikely in the U.S. due to Federal feed regulations.

 

The Harvard model is a useful tool in evaluating the potential effectiveness of regulatory changes proposed by USDA and FDA.

 

Since the confirmation of BSE in North America, USDA has initiated an enhanced BSE surveillance effort.  In addition, both USDA and FDA have implemented or proposed new regulations designed to reduce the risk of transmission of BSE.

 

RESOLUTION: The National Institute for Animal Agriculture (NIAA) encourages FDA and USDA to utilize appropriate risk assessment tools, including the Harvard model and results of the enhanced BSE surveillance effort in evaluating changes to regulations regarding BSE.  Results of these evaluations should be used in determining the utility of regulations.

 

NIAA continues to encourage USDA and FDA to utilize science as a basis for public policy decisions regarding BSE.  Prior to initiating regulations affecting the US livestock industry, greater emphasis needs to be placed on utilizing OIE standards as well as negotiating North American minimum regulatory standards that will better harmonize regulations and facilitate trade from minimum risk regions based on science. 

 

Continued emphasis on building collaboration with all affected state and industry partners is critical to long-term success of the National BSE Surveillance program.

 

Further regulatory efforts to implement a mammalian-to-mammalian protein ban or total SRM ban in all animal feed must be based on cost/risk reduction benefit analysis and comprehensive SRM, deadstock disposal planning.

 

Approved: 2004 | Amended: 2005
  • Want to print this resolution?  Click here for the best format.

Use of Bovine Blood

 

BACKGROUND: Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) is a chronic, degenerative disorder affecting the nervous system of cattle.  It is associated with consumption of animal proteins contaminated with specific risk materials containing the infective agent.

 

Fifteen years of scientific research has demonstrated no detectable BSE agent in Bovine blood and no transmission of BSE from cow to cow through blood.  Bovine blood is not classified as an SRM by the OIE.

 

Plasma, serum and fractions thereof contain biologically important components, including immunoglobulins, which may be used in colostrum supplements, colostrum replacers and feed supplements to reduce risk of transmission of Johne’s disease, brucellosis and other economically important diseases transmitted via colostrum.

 

RESOLUTION: The National Institute for Animal Agriculture (NIAA), based on current science, encourages FDA to retain the current bovine blood and blood products exemption to the ruminant feed ban, including plasma, serum and fractions thereof for diets used in ruminants and non-ruminants. 

 

Approved: 2004   |   Amended: 2005
  • Want to print this resolution?  Click here for the best format.

U.S. Bovine Tuberculosis Strategic Plan (2004)

 

BACKGROUND:  Increased problems with dairy cattle tuberculosis in the western states, persistent tuberculosis in imported Mexican cattle, exposure of dairy heifer replacements in feed-lot conditions, and the continued problem of bovine tuberculosis in Michigan white tail deer and cattle has resulted in the development of the 2004 U.S. TB Strategic Plan.  Increased funding and surveillance will be required to meet the challenge of continued infection.

 

RESOLUTION: The National Institute for Animal Agriculture (NIAA) supports adequate funding in the APHIS USDA budget to implement the 2004 U.S. TB Strategic Plan.

 

Approved: 2004  |  Amended: 2005
  • Want to print this resolution?  Click here for the best format.

Cattle Health Committee Home Page
__________________

2005-2006 Resolutions and Position Statements Home Page
__________________