|
Questions Directed to Session IV Panel
Kevin
Haas, National Band and Tag I
don't know about everybody else here but I am just about at information
overload at this point. The discussions I have heard from all
manufacturers, we manufacturers, in providing yet another product to the
market, being barcoded eartags. I keep hearing the word,
"database." Central database, keeping the information flow
centralized, being able to access the information no matter where you are.
And just to share with everyone something that I learned recently, I am
sure everyone has heard in the news lately that the computer super highway
that a lot of people want to put in, what they are talking about is a
product that is already there and it is called the Internet. I don't know
anything about the Internet but I just bought this book the other day and
it has a disc inside that will allow me to load it on my computer at home
and log onto the Internet. I looked in the glossary or the introduction in
this book and it is almost like it is a revelation. It almost sounds like
we could set up a database on the Internet and everybody in the whole
country could access and get the information they wanted. It is not
necessarily a question, it might just be more of a thought provoking
statement, maybe the use of the Internet could be the database everybody
keeps talking about that may be accessible at this point. I don't know the
first thing about Internet, all I know is that it may be a useful tool. James
Davis, USDA-APHIS This
would indeed be a continuing shift in our paradigm of livestock
identification, but there are many applications we would have to look at. Q.
Ken Larson, Lockhead El) Technology Dr.
Unger, two parts: you didn't mention anything about the cost of the DNA
system, could you just briefly outline that a little bit for us and then
the 50 minutes, if there is a simple reason, why does it take 50 minutes
to do your analysis? A.
Thomas Unger, Miragen The
50 minutes refers to the antibody profile assay. It takes 50 minutes to
perform so once you put on the blood sample, you have to go through those
four steps and by the end of the 50 minutes you will have this color
coded, bar coded, identification of that animal. That is a process that
requires about 50 minutes. Q.
Unidentified Any
way to accelerate that? The processing plant now processes an animal in
what I understand is a matter of seconds. A.
Thomas Unger, Miragen There
are, if sample size is not limiting, you could probably accelerate that
somewhat. The test that we have right now was developed more for human
applications where you are getting a sample, you are doing clinical trial
evaluation, you are evaluating presence of a virus or something like that.
You don't want to waste a lot of sample for identification, that is what
the test is originally geared to do. If sample size was limiting, if you
are at a slaughter house I imagine that is not going to be a problem, you
could probably speed that up somewhat. As far as DNA testing, DNA testing
is going to be a lot longer and probably more expensive because the
antibody profile assay takes blood, whatever you can scrape blood off a
piece of fabric and use it. Now DNA, that is going to be an additional
step because DNA is typically contained within cells. You break that, but
there is significantly more information that you can obtain with DNA so if
you have a little bit of time, DNA might be a better route to go. DNA also
has the advantage of requiring literally one single cell in order to get
that information. The antibody profile is very sensitive but it is not
down to a level where if you could take one cell under a microscope so
there are some tradeoffs between the two technologies, speed, sensitivity
and things like that. The cost of antibody profile is typically at about
$12 an assay, something like that and it is a comparative test which means
you typically run two strips or if you trying to match something. Q.
Unidentified You
are saying $12 if we send you the sample. What if we have the equipment in
the plant, what are we looking at cost wise? A.
Thomas Unger, Miragen About
the same, the test is pretty simple, it can be automated. There are
instruments out there that allow you to run a large number of samples so
the labor component is really insignificant in that sense. Q.
Unidentified But
if I buy the system that does the antibody testing, what am I paying, what
is the cost? A.
Thomas Unger, Miragen We
have different type kits. Our largest, it is still on the order of about
$12 per test. A DNA will typically run probably, depends of what kind of
analysis to be performed, a simple identification it is probably a lot
less, probably about $40 or less. If you want to do some genetic trait
analysis, that will cost a little bit more. Unidentified All
I want is the unique number that this flesh represents. That is all I
want. Thomas
Unger, Miragen OK,
antibody profile assay is what I would recommend, it will cost you $12 a
pop. You don't need to perform an assay each time, that can actually be
archived. Archiving with the system I explained is roughly about $.75 per
part and that allows you essentially indefinite storage. Arne
Nielsen, MAGTAG I/S I
am not able to answer the question about the Internet but I would like to
put in at least a comment. When you have the possibility to run a central
cattle database or central database, we need to have a sense from all of
the people that have the right, you have to decide who is allowed to go,
allowed to read or allowed to update. That must be well defined, of
course. That would require, in my opinion, online access for all people
who are able to access this database. From there, on the technical end
there might not be a very big difference between the Internet and the on-line
of a regional basis or central or country or a little country like
Denmark. But, I have seen something about Internet also, but I have not
found out the whys of it yet. Session Wrap-Up Nancy Robinson, Livestock Marketing Association I
agree with you, I am at information overload myself so I will keep this
quick and fast. We have learned a lot today, I think. We found out that
the demands for effective cost efficient compatible systems of ID are
there, are clearly there. We have learned that the federal government is
prepared to partner with the private sector in developing, encouraging and
establishing national systems of ID. Also, it is clear that we want to
control the ID agenda, not have it controlled for us or imposed on us by
the government. There are clearly issues of standardization, cost, what ID
systems work for the various species and segments of the industry, data
management systems, etc. ID technology has become highly advanced and is
being surely, if not slowly, incorporated into farming and ranching
operations, feed lots, markets and slaughter plants for tracking genetics,
production management, regulatory traceback for disease, residue and
pathogen control.
|