A new international theme: 

“BIOSECURITY” IN FOOD AND AGRICULTURE

Discussions at the FAO

 

Alfonso Torres, DVM. PhD., NYS Animal Heath Diagnostic Laboratory, Cornell University

 

The purpose of this paper is to summarize discussions at the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) on the topic of Biosecurity in Food and Agriculture. The FAO Committee on Agriculture commissioned these initiatives in 2001. As a result of this mandate, the FAO organized an Expert Consultation onBiosecurity in Food and Agriculture held in Rome in September of 2002 with the participation of ten international experts and representatives from several international organizations. One of the objectives of the Expert Consultation was to organize a follow up meeting with the participation of a large number of nations.  That meeting took the form of a Technical Consultation on “Biological Risk Management for Food and Agriculture” held at Bangkok in January 2003. Representatives from 38 counties, mostly developing countries and nine international organizations participated at this gathering. While invited to attend, neither the United States nor members of the European Union participated at this gathering.

 

One of the challenges of these discussions is that “Biosecurity” is a relatively new concept, and a term with still evolving meanings. A recent Internet search for the term “Biosecurity” yielded some 60,000 documents, 1,000 groups and 600 images. The FAO defines Biosecurity in a much broader context than the one in used in the US, particularly in recent times. For the purpose of the international discussions, the following definitions of “Biosecurity” and “Biosafety” has been used (1):

 

Biosecurity encompasses all policy and regulatory frameworks (including instruments and activities) to manage risks associated with food and agriculture (including relevant environmental risks). Biosecurity is composed of three sectors, namely food safety, plant life and health, and animal life and health. These sectors include food production in relation to food safety, the introduction of plant pests, animal pests and diseases, and zoonoses, the introduction and release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their products, and the introduction and safe management of invasive alien species and genotypes. Biosecurity thus has direct relevance to food safety, the conservation of the environment (including biodiversity), and sustainability of agriculture.”

 

A separate, though linked, concept is “Biosafety”, which is specific to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, and used in the regulation of the release and transboundary movement of living modified organisms (LMOs). Biosecurity in food and agriculture must be developed in harmony with the provisions of the Cartagena Protocol, but it should be noted that while “Biosafety” is broader than “Biosecurity” in food and agriculture, in that it covers the use of LMOs in medicine as well, it is also narrower, in that it refers only to LMOs.

 

An additional complication to the broad and diverse use of the term “Biosecurity” is that in many languages, particularly in Spanish, French and Italian, there are no different words to differentiate between  “Biosecurity” from “Biosafety”. For that reason it was recommended that these terms be used in italics and not be translated in official documents.

 

The concept of “Biosecurity” applies to three main sectors: animal life and health; plant life and health; and food safety. Participants at these international meetings acknowledged that achieving Biosecurity required understanding and managing diverse and complex risks and measures, and that this had to be accomplished while respecting differences among sectors and organizations. In that regard, there are extensive guidelines and directives from the three “WTO Sisters”, namely the Office international des épizooties (OIE) for animal health; the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) for plant health; and the Codex Alimentarius Commission for food safety. These three main sectors also include the introduction and release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), live modified organisms (LMOs), and invasive alien species and genotypes. For these activities, guidelines are found in other international agreements, particularly the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (2). It should be noted here that the CBD is in the process of being ratified by the international community, and it is not in effect yet. The United States government has indicated no interest in ratifying the CBD at this time.

 

There is good international consensus that in order to achieve “Biosecurity” countries require a greater understanding of, and the ability to analyze diverse and complex risks, and determine and apply measures in a coherent manner, while respecting differences among involved sectors and organizations. It was also concluded that a holistic and coordinated risk analysis is the most important unifying concept across different “Biosecurity” sectors. Such efforts will require that countries should determine the potential for synergies and harmonization within their national (federal) and sub-national (state) regulatory frameworks. It was also indicated that while the risk analysis procedures may differ depending on the hazards addressed, the general principles for risk analysis in food and agriculture are the same (3). The big task will be to harmonize or coordinate the different risk analysis guidelines that the OIE, the IPPC, the Codex Alimentarius, and the CBD (and its Cartagena Protocol) are promulgating.

 

One of the big challenges, especially for less developed countries, and for countries in transition (a term used for the former Soviet Union countries) is the need for coordinated and sustainable capacity building as the challenges of “Biosecurity” are placing increasing demands on their regulatory infrastructure. Capacity building is needed in many areas, including communicational, legal, institutional, scientific and technical aspects.

 

Another important global need is to facilitate improved communication among countries on these activities. To that extend, FAO, in collaboration with relevant organizations, is proposing the development of a publicly accessible, Internet-based “Biosecurity” portal mechanism for exchange of official information on, animal and plant health, food safety and the environment. It is hoped that through these efforts, countries should ensure adequate opportunities for appropriate participation of all stakeholders, including members of the public, in addressing “Biosecurity” issues, enabling them to contribute in the design and implementation of “Biosecurity” risk management actions (4).

 

The final recommendations from the Bangkok meeting will be presented to the next meeting of the FAO Committee on Agriculture later this year for their endorsement and support in the continuation of FAO involvement in these areas. Consequently, while there is no short-term effect in the way that we in the United States handle these issues, it is important to all of us to be aware of these international efforts that could change the way in which we deal with trading partners in the future.  Finally, it is also important to be aware that the term “Biosecurity” has a different broader international meaning than the one that the meaning that we assigned to this word these days (2).  

 

Complete references are found at FAO web site:

 

www.fao.org/ES/ESN/food/meetings_biosecurity_en.stm#background

 

Selected references from above: 

 

  1. Biosecurity in food and agriculture: scope and relevance. Report of the Expert Consultation on Biosecurity in Food and Agriculture (TC/BRM 03/2), FAO, Rome, Italy, September 10-13, 2002.

 

  1. Report of the Technical Consultation on Biological Risk Management in Food and Agriculture (TC/BRM/Rep), FAO, Bangkok, Thailand, January 13–17, 2003.

 

  1. The Use of Risk Analysis in Biological Risk Management for Food and Agriculture, (TC/BRM 03/4), Technical Consultation on Biological Risk Management in Food and Agriculture, FAO, Bangkok, Thailand, January 13–17, 2003.

 

  1. Concept paper for the development of the International Portal for Food Safety, Animal and Plant Health (IPFSAPH), (TC/BRM 03/5), Technical Consultation on Biological Risk Management in Food and Agriculture, FAO, Bangkok, Thailand, January 13–17, 2003.